Category Archives: Uncategorized

‘Drawdown’ update

I’ll let Paul Hawken do the talking:

(see an update from Tom Brady’s wife on Drawdown below)

I want to share three important areas of interest with you.

First, the Drawdown book took off like a rabbit on its release date April 18th and became the #9 New York Times bestseller in its first week. This is the first time a climate or environmental book achieved this distinction in over 25 years. The last two were Bill McKibben’s The End of Nature in 1989 and Al Gore’s Earth in the Balance in 1992. After only eight weeks, it is in its fourth printing. After two decades of books, blogs, and articles that have been unrelenting in terms of threat if not fear, the world is hungry to know what we can do together as communities, parents, companies, schools, students, churches, cities, and more.

Our Advisor, Jon Foley, head of the California Academy of Science, believes the world does not need more climate science or facts in order to change. Society has been hammered by them. The climate movement has often operated from a “science deficit model,” the idea that if people have more facts about what is going wrong and how things are worsening more quickly, that will solve the problem in terms of lack of engagement. It has the opposite effect as psychologists are quick to point out. The Drawdown approach has gained a large following quickly because it does not make people wrong or invoke fear and doom as a motivating method. We believe the science is impeccable. The IPCC has created an astounding problem statement. The daily reports about climate impacts reinforce the accuracy and rigor of the problem statement. Given that, we need to work vigorously on the solutions, all of the solutions. People have never before seen a comprehensive, science-based list of solutions until Drawdown.

Second, we are now working directly with the Commonwealth of Nations based out of London. Formerly the British Commonwealth until 1969, it comprises 52 nations with nearly one-third of the world’s population. Under the leadership of the Secretary-General, Patricia Scotland, the Commonwealth is initiating with its member nations an initiative based on Drawdown: Regenerative Development through Reversing Climate Change (RDRCC). We work hand-in-hand with the Secretary General and her staff. Our research team led by Chad Frischmann will be endeavoring to map applicable solutions onto specific nation-states to measure the beneficial impacts, the positive externalities. We believe, based on analysis and data, that economic regeneration, ecological regeneration, social regeneration, and the regeneration of the atmosphere are identical. We are the only species without full employment, and never has so much work needed to be done. My personal motto for the RDRCC is “Let there be jobs.” We firmly believe that the only way to reverse global warming is to meet human needs. Providing dignified, family-wage employment that provides people world over a sense of worth and meaning is the pathway to reversing global warming. Our data show that is is profitable on virtually every level. Please see the link below for more information.

Third, and this is critical, we truly need your support. People may believe that having a best-selling book and a wonderfully designed website indicate that we are well-funded organization. Because the entire staff had been devoted to both the creation and promotion of the book, we were not able to direct our attention to fundraising. It was all hands on deck. If you believe in the importance of the work, if you want comprehensive, science-based solutions to lead the climate movement instead of fear and despair, if you appreciate what we have been able to do with very modest amounts of money, know that we urgently need your financial support. Please help us help the world to pursue the reversal of global warming. Thank you.

Paul Hawken

——————————————–UPDATE——————

Even Tom Brady is supporting Drawdown with his wife Gisele Buenchen:   http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gisele-bundchen-evironmentalist-paul-hawken-climate-change/

“….Tom Brady says, ‘Unless I had this plant-based diet, I would not be the player I am and I would not be — have the career at 39 that I do,'” Rose said.
 
“He’s almost 40, right? … But the thing is, he said he’s been feeling so much better, I have to say it’s amazing. You know? The way he feels, he doesn’t feel achy. He just feels so much more energy,” Bündchen said.  …”http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/gisele-bundchen-on-tom-bradys-concussions

eating local

You’ve heard that eating local is the thing to do.  But how about sourcing all your food locally – is that even possible?  From your tea/coffee to your starches (rice, potatoes, pasta), to your drinks.  I’m lucky if I can  arrive at 50% – and that’s in Northern California – where we have ample fruits, vegies, rice, wine, etc.

I would be fortunate to get 50% of my food intake locally.   Starting with my first morning routine: coffee.  How can I  get local coffee when the nearest coffee plantation is in Santa Barbara – 400 miles away?  … and they have 5 acres with beans selling at $60/lb.  How can 90% of consumers in 1st world countries get their coffee or teas locally? Where are the large tea/coffee plantations in the USA or Europe?

——————————————————————————–

Another consideration in going local on all  food is the seasonality.  It’s easier in summer, difficult in winter.  They say an apple stored in a warehouse for several months, is way carbon intensive than an apple shipped from Chile.  That gives me pause.  Maybe the best solution is dehydration or canning.  Freezing in my book uses way too much energy, although it is quick and convenient.

Again, I am spoiled in California – we have year round greens:  the Salinas valley on the coast has year-round moderate temperatures and hectares of greenhouses.

I think greenhouses, vertical and urban farming have tremendous bright futures as fresh, local food becomes more important to every human.

Is it really local?

The label ‘local’ and ‘regional’ are not regulated.  I don’t trust my local farmer markets anymore.  There are unlabeled white trucks from industrial farms 500 miles away pretending to be local organic farmers.  I ask questions and am connected with local farmers and CSAs where I volunteer and help out on.

For most people the best they can do is join a local CSA and  get to know their own local farmers and pay them fairly.   I find that many local farmers discard  ‘not-so-perfect’ food since customers won’t buy them – so you probably get a bounty of imperfect produce at  low cost.

———————————————-

Here’s a great article on one European’s experience in sourcing all their food locally…German DW article

http://www.dw.com/en/would-you-eat-local-for-a-week-i-tried-and-discovered-what-eating-green-really-means/a-36751273

 

Winter weirding

This is a record setting January.  WinSol is buried in a winter wonderland of snow with more on the way.

 This is a record January with 237 inches beating the old record for January of 159 inches set in 1973.

The learning center dome has its first real test under heavy snows and seems to be holding up pretty good.  We’ll see what the 72 hour snow fatigue does to the Cupola soon.  It’s really a beautiful setting as long as one has adequate heating, food and water – AND – doesn’t need to go anywhere.


Feb 22nd update:  Yep, it’s been a record snowfall for February also.  Lake Tahoe lake level is at it’s highest level EVER.  Kirkwood (my fav ski area) got over 72″ of new snow just
in the past 7 days.

 I keep getting these email updates almost every other day of some ridiculous # of snow inches that just fell.  When you gotta DIG OUT the chair lifts… what can I say:

Unfortunately, the Carson Spur and the ski resort itself is having open/close issues – and this veteran skier is only a blue-bird.  Although I am on my 17th ski day already this year.

WinSol and the learning center came out of the deep snow just fine.  There’s only one small leak on the cupola and NO cracking… whew… gotta but some acrylic bars across that this summer for the next big snow weirding.

the Rebound effect

Latest research shows that a rebound effect cancels out most good intentions like:  carbon reduction, energy & fuel efficiency, etc.

A rebound effect is:  ‘buy a more fuel efficient car and drive more’.  It’s been proven that higher efficiency cars are driven more.

Changes in behavior more than offset energy savings.

The rebound effect has been well documented in the past, but is lately gaining more attention.  Europe first experienced this rebound effect with its carbon cap programs in the early 90’s when eastern coal plants started producing more CO2 after western utilities gained carbon credits from installing scrubbers.

Reductions to global warming, climate change goals,  air and water pollution reduction programs are not yielding predicted results.  The IPCC’s  Rio+20 report is an omen for future efforts.  So how does one impact human behavior?

Rebound Solutions    A recent study on German households  has concluded that any policy changes are offset by a 57-67% rebound effect.  What to do?   Some studies have shown that fuel taxes appear to be more effective at changing behaviors.    So when that proposal for a carbon tax comes around,  we should all be supporting it.  Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is… you know…

 

DAPL protest

It’s the water.  We need it to live.  We really shouldn’t be mixing it with oil or natural gas or methane.  Ultimately the upstream solution is to totally disconnect ourselves from fossil fuels which are the real ‘alternative energies’.  el Sol is the only true energy source for Gaia.

So I went to a protest in dowimg_20161115_082203ntown SF… the second one in 5 years (occupy was earlier).  There were 2,000+ there – and mostly young-uns!  wow – that is so cool. I do hope this stuff about skipping generations is true, cuz the GenXers sure never woke up to protest our endless wars in the Middle East.

This protest ‘theme’ has my full attention and passion.  Not only is it VERY specific (about water)  and proposes specific solutions (no pipelines close to rivers & aquifers, but it is ALSO about not infringing on the sovereign rights of indigenous people – the ones we did a genocide on which we still have not dealt with!  So Standing Rock and all it’s supporters around the world … ROCK ON.  (note:  this is only the second of many, many pipeline protests to come… the first big-un was the Keystone Excel, this is gettin’ legs, babeee!)

So here I is….

dapl-protest

 

 

img_20161115_075048

 

DAPL = Dakota Access PipeLine

 

Lukewarming

Ok, I admit it:  I’m not really a climate change group thinker or believer anymore , BUT neither am I a  skeptic or climate denier – perhaps I am a lukewarmer,  What the heck is that, you ask???

When it comes to climate change – aka global weirding – I am classifying myself now as a lukewarmer. 

I’m a bit tired of the pop media and group think around climate change – it’s a bit too much – it’s like the environmentalism of the  80’s & 90’s:  let’s do less bad… and if you are not with us you’re against us. We’re about to battle this in Congress when climate science gets in front of Trump’s climate deniers. Oh such entertainment!

Climate change pundits and most scientists focus 100% on emissions.  This is wrong.   Climate change is redundant – it always changes.  And yes, humans are a major contributor – but I sure wish people would stop making us feel guilty about it.   Instead of doing less bad things,  how about we start doing some GOOD things:  like putting biochar back into the soil.  All climate changers keep doing is pounding us with having less CO2 emissions,  having a smaller carbon footprint: stop buying this, start eating that.

Like Dr. Braungart once told me:  if zero emissions are our goal, we should all be DOA (dead).  Humans are part of nature – we’re organic aren’t we?  So it’s quite natural for us to have ’emissions’.  His co-author in ‘Cradle to Cradle’     and partner Bill McDonough just published a paper on a new language for carbon — if we can change our carbon language to do more good, rather than less bad – perhaps we can design a world that will reduce carbon emissions as a by-product rather than declaring a WAR again…

Bill talks about living, durable and future carbon, rather than zero emission.   Here’s a synopsis: “The world’s current carbon strategy aims to promote a goal of zero. Predominant language currently includes words such as “low carbon,” “zero carbon,” “negative carbon,” and even a “war on carbon.” To show progress, according to McDonough, the design world needs values-based language that reflects a safe, healthy and just world. In this new paradigm, by building urban food systems and cultivating closed-loop flows of carbon nutrients, carbon can be recognized as an asset rather than a toxin, and the life-giving carbon cycle can become a model for human designs.”  http://finance.yahoo.com/news/william-mcdonough-offers-language-carbon-160000133.html Continue reading Lukewarming

GMO – here we go again…

…with another consumer scam sponsored by ‘Profits-R-Us’ corporate food greedies. BUT this time it’s a bit different: WE  HAVE A CHOICE.  Please pass this on to your friends…

IGNORE ‘non-GMO’ food labels.  Please, it’s good for you.

the story behind the story…

Consumers are starting to focus on buying non-GMO labeled products. This trend may decimate the organic industry.  Consumers unwittingly think that ‘non GMO’ is also organic. It is not. The dirty secret is non-GMO certified products have nothing to do with organic, and can freely use all industrial farming and heavy pesticide practices among other things.

Consumers are ‘eating up’ (pun intended) the non-GMO label more than the ‘organic’ label and are unwittingly increasing sales of industrial food conglomerates that use pesticides, …. other non-organic practices here….

It gets crazier: non-GMO labels are appearing on dairy and meat products. This is meaningless!

There have been several peer-reviewed scientific studies done debunking the notion that animals being fed GMO feed ‘transmit’ that GMO into their blood stream and into milk, eggs, and meat. There is NO DIFFERENCE between non-GMO labeled dairy and meat products and those that don’t have that label – except price (sometimes 2-3X higher). GMO grain fed cows, pigs, chickens do not produce GMO milk, beef, pork, eggs.

The new label of ‘Non GMO certified’ is a Trojan horse if there ever was one. It basically means it could or could not be organic (most aren’t) and everything else (besides the non-GMO) is industrial farm grade: pesticides, harmful practices, round-up, dirty water, etc.

Your better buy is to look for both labels, side by side (but they ARE duplicative since USDA organic already omits GMO):

Here’s details from an SF Chronicle article:

…organic farmers who objected to the label feel that the non-GMO designation takes away from organic certification, which already requires that farmers avoid using genetically engineered seed and animal feed. Meanwhile, some conventional dairy farmers said the term “non-GMO milk” makes their perfectly safe product sound scary…..

….. Eenennaam’s research has concluded that DNA from genetically engineered feed is not passed to milk or meat. Her 2014 scientific review of 30 years of livestock studies showed no difference in the health of animals given genetically engineered feed and those consuming unmodified feed, or a difference in the nutritional makeup of their meat or milk.

“We are really talking marketing here — developing a product line to differentiate it from a product that already does not contain GMOs,” she said. “As a company they of course can develop whatever products they want and if they see a profitable market — then it is a good business decision.”

It just doesn’t stop! Why do corporations continue to confuse, deceive and mislead consumers in the name of profit? Why is the media not more omnipresent and on top of these things?

On another note, the name ‘Monsanto’ is soon to disappear into ‘Bayer’ and everyone things that Bayer is an aspirin company. Bayer is almost worse than Monsanto when one looks at the ‘sudden bee collapse’ that Bayer’s nicotine based pesticides are mostly responsible.  More info here… link.

my next civil disobedience…

The next civil disobedience I will participate in will  be in the Pacific Northwest either at Vancouver or Longmont, Washington.

These two areas are prime candidates for development of deep sea ports and sizeable increases of rail-yard volume to accommodate oil and coal rail cars from the Bakken fields of North Dakota and beyond (think Alberta tar sands). More pipelines are already being built unbeknown to most people, skirting around any opposition silently underground.

The little town of Mosier, Oregon experienced a close call oil derailment not too long ago.  On a Friday in early June, more than 40,000 gallons of Bakken crude spilled in a fiery oil train derailment that burned for 14 hours. Jerry Oliver is a port commissioner in Vancouver, Wash., and a vocal supporter of what would be the largest oil-by-rail terminal in the country, known as the Vancouver Energy Project.  If built, the terminal would more than double the number of mile-long oil trains traveling along the Columbia River, to about 46 trains per week.

The Mosier derailment has led the Oregon Department of Transportation torequest the federal government issue a moratorium on oil trains in the Gorge and elsewhere throughout the state.

Protests have already started, and are sure to get bigger.   More than 100 protesters blocked BNSF Railway tracks in Vancouver, Washington, on Saturday, June 18, 2016, to protest oil train activity in the Northwest. Police arrested 21 people who refused to vacate the tracks as they protested oil train activity in the Pacific Northwest.

————————————————————————————-The current volume of oil & coal being shipped is staggering, and there’s a lot more profits to be made by increasing this volume. Is this a good thing? Is it good to keep supplying our addiction to gasoline and to keep prices down?

We are all enjoying cheaper prices at the pump. But at what price? Are we leveraging our grandkids’ future for instant gratification today (cheaper prices)?

There may be some short term pain at the pumps, but the sooner we start paying the real price of climate change fossil fuels, the sooner electric/hydrogen cars and more renewable technologies will be sprouted and competitive.

Since our systems looks mostly at short term returns and risks, oil trains are once again coming front and center.

The Quebec derailment and tragedy is a distant (3 year)
memory. 42+ people were killed… here’s the wikipedia link.  

Do we really need to wait until we have a similar disaster before we act?  I think not!  And I’ll be doing my small part by helping block the tracks… join me if you dare.